Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with vinorelbine versus gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer.

Park, In Hae; Ro, Jungsil; Lee, Keun Seok; Kim, Shi Nae; Yun, Young Ho; Nam, Byung Ho
Investigational new drugs
2010Oct ; 28 ( 5 ) :659-69.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Park, In Hae -
Ro, Jungsil -
Lee, Keun Seok -
Kim, Shi Nae -
Yun, Young Ho -
Nam, Byung Ho -
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No clear data are available concerning the superiority of combination chemotherapy to sequential therapy using agents beyond 1st or 2nd line chemotherapy for treating patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive a combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine until disease progression followed by vinorelbine monotherapy. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires.

RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomized to the combination arm and 40 were randomized to the sequential arm. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range, 1-23) for the combination arm and 6 (range, 1-25) for the sequential arm. Patients receiving combination therapy had a higher composite response rate (26.8% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.106) but a shorter median time to treatment failure (3.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.252) as compared to patients receiving sequential monotherapy. Median overall survival for the combination and sequential arms was 10.6 months and 8.9 months, respectively (P = 0.436). Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms. Quality of life measurements in global health, role, and social function were superior in the combination arm (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine therapy appears comparable to sequential monotherapy for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer as demonstrated by improved quality of life outcomes with similar therapeutic efficacies and incidences of adverse events.
na
MESH
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*administration & dosage/adverse, Breast Neoplasms/*drug therapy/*pathology, Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs &, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Quality of Life, Survival Analysis, Time Factors, Treatment Failure, Vinblastine/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*analogs &
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine therapy appears comparable to sequential monotherapy for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1007/s10637-009-9285-x
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå