Randomized phase 2 study of subcutaneous amifostine versus epoetin-alpha given 3 times weekly during concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

Han, Hye-Suk; Han, Ji-Youn; Yu, Sun Young; Pyo, Hong Ryull; Kim, Hyae Young; Cho, Kwan Ho; Lee, Dae Ho; Kim, Heung Tae; Lee, Jin Soo
Cancer
2008Oct ; 113 ( 7 ) :1623-31.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Han, Hye-Suk -
Han, Ji-Youn -
Yu, Sun Young -
Pyo, Hong Ryull -
Kim, Hyae Young -
Cho, Kwan Ho -
Lee, Dae Ho -
Kim, Heung Tae -
Lee, Jin Soo -
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the role of amifostine and epoetin-alpha in reducing severe toxicities during concurrent chemo-hyperfractionated radiotherapy (CCRT) for limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS: Seventy-six patients with LD-SCLC were enrolled. The treatment schedule was consisted of two 28-day cycles of cisplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 8) and irinotecan at a dose of 60 mg/m2 (Days 1, 8, and 15) followed by two 21-day cycles of cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 (Day 1) and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (Days 1-3) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for a total of 45 grays. Patients were randomly assigned at registration to either amifostine at a dose of 500 mg or epoetin-alpha at a dose of 10,000 IU subcutaneously 3 times weekly (n = 36 patients and 40 patients, respectively). Fifteen of 36 patients assigned to the amifostine arm did not receive amifostine because of a lack of supply.

RESULTS: Amifostine treatment was associated with higher febrile neutropenia (P = .003) and grade 2 or 3 nausea (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) (P = .03). It also demonstrated a trend toward higher grade 4 leukopenia (P = .05). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 30% of patients treated with amifostine and 9% of patients treated with epoetin-alpha (P = .059). Epoetin-alpha treatment was associated with less grade 2 or 3 anemia (P = .031) and lower decreases in hemoglobin level during CCRT (P = .016). The median survival times for both treatment arms were comparable (22.6 months in the amifostine arm vs 25.6 months in the epoetin-alpha arm; P = .447).

CONCLUSIONS: Although amifostine administered 3 times weekly during CCRT did not significantly reduce severe toxicities, epoetin-alpha was effective in preventing severe anemia during CCRT in patients with LD-SCLC. Other radioprotective strategies to minimize severe toxicities should be investigated.
amifostine, epoetin-a, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, small cell lung cancer
MESH
Aged, Amifostine/*administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Carcinoma, Small Cell/*drug therapy/*radiotherapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Dose Fractionation, Drug Administration Schedule, Epoetin Alfa, Erythropoietin/*administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Lung Neoplasms/*drug therapy/*radiotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Radiation-Protective Agents/*administration & dosage, Recombinant Proteins, Survival Analysis
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Amifostine administered 3 times weekly during CCRT did not significantly reduce severe toxicities, however, epoetin-a was effective in preventing severe anemia during CCRT in patients with LD-SCLC.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1002/cncr.23790.
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå