The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement

대한흉부외과학회지 2018년 51권 3호 p.161 ~ p.166

(Nardi Paolo) - Tor Vergata University Policlinic of Rome Cardiac Surgery Division
(Russo Marco) - Tor Vergata University Policlinic of Rome Cardiac Surgery Division
(Saitto Guglielmo) - Tor Vergata University Policlinic of Rome Cardiac Surgery Division
(Ruvolo Giovanni) - Tor Vergata University Policlinic of Rome Cardiac Surgery Division

Abstract

Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is a controversial issue in current clinical practice. PPM has been reported to have a negative impact on patients’ prognosis after aortic valve replacement in several studies, showing increased all-cause and cardiac mortality. Moreover, a close relationship has recently been described between PPM and structural valve deterioration in biological prostheses. In patients at risk for PPM, several issues should be considered, and in the current era of cardiac surgery, preoperative planning should consider the different types of valves available and the various surgical techniques that can be used to prevent PPM. The present paper analyses the state of the art of the PPM issue.

키워드

Aortic valve replacement, Patient-prosthesis mismatch, Prognostic significance
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보
학술진흥재단(KCI) KoreaMed 대한의학회 회원 
주제코드
주제명(Target field)
연구대상(Population)
연구참여(Sample size)
대상성별(Gender)
질병특성(Condition Category)
연구환경(Setting)
연구설계(Study Design)
연구기간(Period)
중재방법(Intervention Type)
중재명칭(Intervention Name)
키워드(Keyword)
유효성결과(Recomendation)
Moderate PPM should be avoided in patients with certain conditions, such as depressed left ventricular function, severe left ventricular hypertrophy, age <70 years, an athletic lifestyle, and concomitant mild or moderate mitral regurgitation not addressed by surgery, as well as in elderly patients seeking an enhanced quality of life.
연구비지원(Fund Source)
근거수준평가(Evidence Hierarchy)
출판년도(Year)
참여저자수(Authors)
대표저자
KCD코드
ICD 03
건강보험코드